Purpose: Finding a relationship between mass and period.
In the beginning, Professor Wolf gave us a function T = A(m + Mtray)^n ( m is the mass we added, Mtray is the weight is the tray, T is the period, A and n are unknown constant. It turned our purpose into verifying the power law.)
Set up:
- Use a C-clamp to secure the inertial balance to the tabletop. Put a thin piece of masking tape on the end of the inertial balance.
- Set up a photogate so the when the balance is oscillating the tape completely passes through the beam of the photogate.
- Set up the LabPro with a power adapter, USB cable, and plug adapter plugged into the DIG/SONIC1 input.
- Open the Logger Pro application.
- Then, start to collect the data.
- We can easily simplify the function T = A(m + Mtray)^n by using nature log. Then, we get lnT = n•ln(m + Mtray) + lnA.
- So the function turns into a linear function, which is y = kx + b.
- Because we do not know the mass of tray, we can suppose it into different value to make the function seem to be a straight line.
We get correlation = 0.9986
Second we tried Mtray = 260g
We get correlation = 0.9994
Last we tried Mtray = 320g
We get correlation = 0.9994
However, this result is a little bit different from what we get in Logger Pro.
In Logger Pro, when we use Mtray = 260g, we get correlation = 0.9999
At that time, we assumed Mtray is around 260g.
In that situation, we know lnT = 0.6246•ln(m + 260) - 4.726
Extension:
- After that, we found the smallest value and the largest value for Mtray when correlation still equal to 0.9999 by changing its value. We get 253g and 280g.
- Before the end, we used the function lnT = n•ln(m + Mtray) + lnA to measure some object's mass.
- First, we tried an iPhone, it comes out the period is 0.387s.
- By using the different values of Mtray, we get is weight between 162g and 164g.
- Then, we tried a tape. The period of it is 0.663s.
- Different values of Mtray show the mass is between 666g and 671g.







In no particular order of importance . . .
ReplyDeleteYou probably don't need to tell that you put stuff into port DIG 1.
Ideally you want to find the range of Mtray values that gives you the highest correlation.
Generally this is really good.
What is missing is calculations, a table of results (a format was suggested on the lab handout).
None of your conclusions really have to deal with the assumptions we made in the lab. When we set up our original equation all of the masses were cylinders centered in the tray.
Our unknown objects had different shapes and perhaps different placement in the tray. We didn't test separately to see if placement or shape made a difference. This isn't a human error so much as an assumption (that mass is the only variable) that maybe turns out not to be true.